Search KrollOntrack.com
March 2003 - Volume 1, Issue 2 Newsletter Archives | Visit KrollOntrack.com
In This Issue:
Computer Forensics and Data Recovery: The Vital Links
The People Who Make It Happen at Kroll Ontrack:
Jennifer Knutsen, Computer Forensics Process Manager
Notes From the Forensic Lab: What’s In a Name?
Kroll Ontrack News and Events:

Computer Forensics and Data Recovery: The Vital Links

In most computer forensic investigations, creating a mirror image of the media is often the first step in the process. In some cases, however, the computer forensic expert cannot image the media because of hardware failure or data loss. Data loss occurs for several reasons. Based on a study by Kroll Ontrack, the most common causes of data loss include:

Hardware or System Malfunction
78 percent
Human Error 11 percent
Software Corruption or Program Malfunction 7 percent
Computer Viruses 2 percent
Natural Disasters 1 percent
Other 1 percent

It is quickly becoming mainstream knowledge that data recovery experts can recover data that an average person would think is no longer available. Slamming a drive (sometimes still in the PC or laptop) onto a concrete floor, setting the drive on fire, submerging it in water (or other liquids) and more does not stop most data recovery experts! In one case, a perpetrator squirted barbeque lighter fluid into the cooling slots of a PC case and then ignited the fumes. They fried the PC, but the data was still recoverable.

Data recovery is a complimentary, but not identical, skill set to computer forensics. Kroll Ontrack is the leader in data recovery – bringing back data from media that have suffered all kinds of abuse. Kroll Ontrack maintains special “clean room” facilities in which engineers can disassemble a drive to diagnose and remediate problems. Where circuit boards or cable connectors have been damaged or destroyed, our engineers can often transplant replacement parts into the drive to make it readable again.

Many public and private sector organizations equipped to perform computer forensics turn to Kroll Ontrack to assist them when data recovery is needed. We can conduct the data recovery under careful chain-of-custody guidelines, and are even equipped to process drives containing U.S. government classified information. Our processing facilities have been honored with two Cogswell Awards from the U.S. Department of Defense for excellence in security over classified materials.

If you discover that the drive where the “smoking gun” email is contained is literally smoking, consider working with our data recovery labs to enable you to get to the data and perform a successful computer forensics investigation.

For more information on Kroll Ontrack’s “Understanding Data Loss” study, see http://www.ontrack.com/datarecovery/dataloss.asp#Hardware.

The People Who Make It Happen at Kroll Ontrack:
Jennifer Knutsen, Computer Forensics Process Manager

Jennifer Knutsen is a seven-year veteran with Kroll Ontrack in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Jen’s focus in her role as Computer Forensics Process Manager involves supervision and training of the Computer Forensics Project Managers, as well as coordination and training for Computer Forensic Engineers. She devotes substantial energy to making sure our technical and project management people understand the best-of-breed forensic procedures, processes and methods.

Jen began her Kroll Ontrack career in the Data Recovery Department’s Inbound Sales unit, and transferred into Computer Forensics when her interest in the science was sparked by her work in data recovery projects that were related to investigative or litigation matters. She has served as the Project Manager for hundreds of recovery and forensic cases, and has become a popular speaker in the field of computer forensics.

Jen has said, “Computer forensics is incredibly exciting and challenging. It is a field that is relatively new to the marketplace and to the courts, and involves educating our clients on a technical level. Because sifting through data stored in electronic form can be a daunting and complex task, it is incredibly important to work with our customers to ‘uncover’ the information that is most relevant to the issues they are pursuing.”

Notes From the Forensic Lab: What’s In a Name?

URL naming conventions were designed to provide both subject matter and geographic information to Internet users. For example, the original aim was that commercial organizations would be registered as “.com” URLs, with not-for-profits in “.org” and Internet-related organizations using “.net” addresses. In addition, two-character country codes were allocated to countries across the globe.

Clearly, we know that just because an address ends in a “.com” does not mean that the organization owning the name (or the server handling it) resides in the United States. Often less realized is that the two-character country codes are not a guarantee of location either. This is true for two reasons. First, some countries actively market their Web addresses for certain professions. For example, the pacific island nation of Tuvalu (which separated from the neighboring Gilbert Islands and gained independence in 1978) was given the Internet country code of “.tv”. Recognizing the value of that code, in 2000 the Tuvalu government negotiated a license leasing the “.tv” code to a registrar company. The former Warsaw Pact state of Moldova has also gained revenue through licensing of its Web abbreviation, “.md”, to Web sites relating to the health sciences.

This became important in a recent Kroll Ontrack case. A European client of a European-based law firm had licensed their technology to a Venezuelan company, for use only within Venezuela. When they checked, the Venezuelan licensee was set up with a Web site ending in “.vz”, which is the Internet top level domain code for Venezuela. But the client had heard rumors that the licensee was in breach of the agreement, and asked us to check on the actual location of the Web site. We determined that although the registration for the URL had been made in Venezuela, the servers running the site and using the licensed technology were not in Venezuela. Rather, they were located in northern New Jersey. We conducted a brief computer forensics investigation and were able to provide a complete, detailed, and documented report to our client.

Kroll Ontrack News and Events:

Learn more about electronic discovery and computer forensics at the following presentations:

4/1/2003
Electronic Discovery: Tips, Tactics & Technology 2003 - Washington, DC
4/7/2003 Assoc. of Legal Administrators - San Diego, CA
4/23/03 Association of Women in Computing - Minneapolis, MN
4/23/03 - 4/24/03 NYS Information Security Conference - Albany, NY

Visit our Upcoming Events section at http://www.krollontrack.com/upcomingevents/ to learn about these presentations and more.

Kroll Ontrack Requests Your Input

If you have a legal or technology issue that you would like to see addressed in this newsletter, or if you are aware of a case, statute, or local rule addressing e-evidence, please contact us at: electronicdiscovery@krollontrack.com. We look forward to hearing from you!

Our legal consultants, project managers, and technology experts strive to stay on top of e-discovery law. If you are aware of any additional local court rules or new cases in this area of the law, please do not hesitate to contact us by writing to abrill@krollontrack.com.

For more information about electronic discovery and computer forensics services, contact Kroll Ontrack at 1-800-347-6105 or www.krollontrack.com.

return to top
© 2003 Kroll Ontrack Inc. 9023 Columbine Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Toll Free: 1-800-347-6105